Coastal

Coastal

Satellite altimetry over the open ocean is reasonably well understood and data are routinely utilized for a variety of ocean applications. On the other hand, many operational needs occur close to the coast, and fully resolving the rapid time-space scale processes - especially those less than 20 km (12 mi) from the coast - are dependent on dedicated processing with adequate corrections (e.g., tides and water vapor), as well as effective removal of land contamination. Additionally, merging data from multiple missions has been shown to improve the spatial and temporal resolution.

Research into coastal applications has resulted in custom-processed coastal altimetry data sets, which are available to the community at large. Indeed, decades of coastal altimetry from past and present altimeters offer the prospect of describing the status of the world's coastal waters, including many stretches where satellite altimetry may provide the only measurement coverage.

Some of the applications that benefit from satellite altimetry data:

Beginning in 2006, there was a significant growth in the number of coast-related publications tied to altimetry data. Research in this topic was spurred by key activities designed to improve coastal data accuracy, such as:

Altimetry Publications: Coastal

In an era of rapid change, accurately measuring coastal phenomenon is of utmost importance. Despite being conceptually straightforward, measuring sea level height near the coast using satellite data is very difficult. New papers are published every year that discuss new methods and algorithms to more accurately measure coastal sea surface height. To gauge the effectiveness of these new processing means, altimetry data are compared to other observations. For example, reprocessed Cryosat-2 data were compared with tide gauge and Jason-2 data, as well as other satellites – Envisat, SARAL/AltiKa – to test the accuracy of the newly processed data (Idanovi, et al., 2017). Similarly, coastal altimetry data along the Great Barrier Reef were validated with HF radar velocity data (Idris, et al., 2017).

Training and Resources

Closely-related Topics